'The truth is but a lie undiscovered'

Today is the 41st anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. So, news programs have trotted out guests to offer pro/con sound bites debating the possibility of a conspiracy.

What I find laughable is how easy it is for the con experts to dismiss the possibility out of hand. I have one fact for them: Oswald was murdered while in custody. That alone is the doorway to a conspiracy.

If Lee Harvey Oswald did everything by himself, why would anyone give up their own life and freedom to kill a man already in custody and virtually assured conviction? Why shut him up, since he could implicate no one but himself? It makes absolutely no sense for Jack Ruby to kill Oswald in broad daylight in a police station with a hundred eyewitnesses--and then try to make a deal with prosecutors while in jail.

That’s just one single fact that points to the possibility, to the likelihood, that there’s more to this than “Oswald acted alone.”

The next suspicious facts are the many sudden and mysterious deaths of key witnesses, including Ruby. And these weren’t witnesses who agreed with the Warren Report. When the witnesses of one side (not both) start having deadly “accidents”, that’s a pretty solid clue.

I can’t say for certain whether Oswald was alone in the book depository (although there is evidence he wasn’t). In fact, a second shooter isn’t even necessary for a conspiracy. But everything AFTER that point screams cover-up. And no one would bother covering up evidence and testimony unless: (1) there was something to cover up, and (2) someone had something to lose if it wasn’t covered up.

And that is something the Warren Commission adamantly wasn’t interested in.